Leila Nemati; Raheleh Seyed Morteza Hosseiny; Azam Mahdavipour
Abstract
The ineffectiveness of punitive-based approaches after the occurrence of terrorist attacks in preventing this criminal phenomenon has led to the development of new strategies in order to control terrorism through preemptive mechanisms and the adoption of preventive measures before the occurrence of terrorist ...
Read More
The ineffectiveness of punitive-based approaches after the occurrence of terrorist attacks in preventing this criminal phenomenon has led to the development of new strategies in order to control terrorism through preemptive mechanisms and the adoption of preventive measures before the occurrence of terrorist crimes. The present article by using descriptive-documentary research method seeks to answer the question that, in order to prevent the harmful risks of terrorism in the precrime stage, what Anticipatory measures have been presented in legal systems? Findings of this research demonstrate that today Anticipatory approaches to containment terrorism have a special station in legal systems. legislative systems by adopting Anticipatory mechanisms before the occurrence of terrorist threats, Have the future-based approach Against this dangerous phenomenon. The most important Anticipatory strategies to control terrorism to include the limitation or prohibition of ownership, financial transparency and prevention of terror financing, communication, training and employment restrictions, residence and monitoring obligations , control on travelling and inspect places. Safeguards for Anticipatory measures in the face of terrorism include administrative measures, Control orders and arrest.
